Trends

Turntable.fm Thinks Big

No Comments 14 November 2012

Turntable.fm Thinks Big

We haven’t heard much from social music service Turntable.fm for a while now, but today the platform is out with some big news — literally. The site has increased the size of its rooms (there used to be a 200-person limit) allowing casual users access to even the most packed of arenas and power users an even bigger audience.

When Turntable.fm launched in 2011, it was huge, buzzy and extremely popular. Over the last year, however, the initial frenzy has died down, and several pundits have declared the hype over Turntable.fm dwindling or dead.

Now, it seems, Turntable.fm is out with some big news that its co-founder, Billy Chasen, thinks is the most drastic to date. In the past, rooms were only able to house 200 people, now, you can cram as many people as you like in a digital venue — when a room fills up, additional people will be sent to “overflow” rooms where they will be able to chat with DJs and other people in the room (but not with folks in other overflow rooms). This is a vital addition when dealing with popular DJs and famous musicians dropping new tracks. I used to run Turntable.fm rooms with bands when I worked at Mashable, and we often had issues with overcrowding. Sometimes we even succeeded in “breaking” Turntable.fm.

In addition, Turntable.fm has widened its digital rooms, rearranged the song queue and chat box so that they’re in separate tabs for easier navigation, and integrated the “favoriting” functions into the DJ booth — just mouse over the icon to save a song to your queue or to purchase or add it on Spotify, iTunes, etc. Apparently, these tweaks are only available on the Web right now, but will soon launch on mobile.

Turntable.fm: http://turntable.fm/

Read More: http://evolver.fm/2012/11/14/turntable-fm-amps-up-the-party-with-bigger-rooms/

  • Google+
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit

Your Comments

No Comments


Share your view

Post a comment

Submit the word you see below:



Notify me of follow-up comments?